Sunum (İngilizce)

Seda YILDIRIM

Raninen defend himself to the court should tell him why he caught by military officer when he was free. But the court deemed that there is no need to examine the breach of this.

?government, physical, reason

EVENTS

Petitioner, Mr. Raninen is a Finland citizen who does not want to do his military service or alternative public service that subrogates it. He postpones his military service. However before this date he states his opinion that he is against the idea of military service. He repeats the same request in written and verbal ways. Then upon he was taken under custody with the suspect that he will not do his military service.

He has been condemned because of this many times, released, rearrested and resentenced. He was handcuffed after one arrestment. He was kept at a different place isolated from other suspects during custody. He was temporarily not suitable to do his military service or the public service that subrogates it due to an under recognized psychological problem by authorities.

LEGAL PROCESS

Raninen filed complaints about being disqualified from freedom and being handcuffed with a petition he sent to the Ombudsman. Military officer R who restricted Raninen’s freedom was listened as suspect upon the request of the Ombudsman. R mentions that he had to handcuff the party after he has was caught because he took an order and within the context of the training that the military police gets. And another officer mentions that Raninen was handcuffed in order to prevent him to escape and that he committed the same crime many times and that this can be excused. The government defended not serious an attack to freedom that. But this station breach of contract and domestic law according to court.